PSRwatchPSRwatch

Transfer calculator

Can Fulham afford this transfer?

This link opens with the latest financial snapshot for Fulham already loaded.

Models the current 2026/27 Premier League season under the squad-cost rules (115% Red Threshold primary). Historical old-PSR season views are on club pages.

Shared scenario · PSRwatch estimate
Fulham + Emile Smith RoweLevy zone

£27m over 5 yrs → £69m room to the Red Threshold. Edit the scenario below - every figure is an independent estimate, not an official ruling.

Build a scenario
Standard inputs first. Accounting extras are in advanced mode.

The result reflects this signing - use “Add to scenario” to stack more moves.

Result
Plain-English read on spending room and squad-cost ratio.
Possible but tighterCrosses the 85% Green Threshold: next season's allowance is cut and, from 2027/28, a levy applies; no sporting sanction. PSRwatch estimate.

This scenario would leave Fulham with approximately £69m of room to the 115% Red Threshold. It would reduce remaining spending room by £10m. The estimated squad-cost ratio would increase from 85.1% to 88.7%, leaving them levy zone. Being above the 85% Green Threshold but inside the 115% Red Threshold means a levy / allowance charge on about £10m of overspend - a fine, not a points deduction.

Post on XDownload card imageThe link unfurls into a card showing this verdict.
Room to Red Threshold (now)
£78m
115% sporting-sanction line
Room to Red Threshold (after)
£69m
still below the Red Threshold
Current Squad Cost Ratio (SCR)
85.1%
of the 115% Red Threshold (Green Threshold 85%)
New Squad Cost Ratio (SCR)
88.7%
of the 115% Red Threshold (Green Threshold 85%)
Room to Green Threshold (now)
£0m
85% levy / allowance line
Room to Green Threshold (after)
-£10m
in the levy / allowance zone
Transfer effect
£10m less room
+9.5 annual squad cost
Status
Levy zone
Sporting-sanction risk
None
Applies only above the 115% Red Threshold
Levy / allowance exposure
£10m
Levy on overspend above the 85% Green Threshold - a fine, not a points deduction
UEFA effect
Not exposed
No current UEFA test
Old PSR model
£37m modelled gap
Baseline allowance · 2023/24-2025/26 closeout - before undisclosed/private adjustments.
Room before the 115% points-deduction threshold£69m
Room before the 85% levy threshold-£10m
How much can Fulham spend?
Answered from the position after the scenario above: -£10m of room before the 85% Green Threshold, £69m before the 115% Red Threshold. PSRwatch estimates on forecast income, not a budget.
Maximum transfer fee
ContractBefore Green (85%)Before Red (115%)
3 years£0mat £0m wages£137mat £21m wages
4 years£0mat £0m wages£166mat £25m wages
5 years£0mat £0m wages£190mat £29m wages

The largest fee whose annual cost (fee spread over the contract, plus wages and estimated associated costs) fits inside the room. Zero means no room at that wage.

Maximum wage for one more signingat a fee of£m over five years
Before the Green Threshold
£0m a year
about £0k a week
Before the Red Threshold
£58m a year
about £1,115k a week
What would need to be sold to create£m of room before the Green Threshold?

The 4 most room-efficient sales reach £12m of room for £3m of proceeds.

  • Alex Borto · Goalkeeperin plan
    at £0m (book value, nil profit): £5m of room, £0m book profit, £5m a year of cost saved
  • Tom Cairney · Central Midfieldin plan
    at £0m (market value): £2m of room, £0m book profit, £2m a year of cost saved
  • Benjamin Lecomte · Goalkeeperin plan
    at £1m (market value): £2m of room, £0m book profit, £2m a year of cost saved
  • Harrison Reed · Central Midfieldin plan
    at £2m (market value): £3m of room, £2m book profit, £3m a year of cost saved
  • Jonah Kusi-Asare · Centre-Forward
    at £3m (market value): £4m of room, -£3m book profit, £5m a year of cost saved
  • Bernd Leno · Goalkeeper
    at £5m (market value): £9m of room, £5m book profit, £7m a year of cost saved
  • Manuel Ángel · Central Midfield
    at £4m (market value): £5m of room, £1m book profit, £5m a year of cost saved
  • Luc De Fougerolles · Centre-Back
    at £4m (market value): £5m of room, £3m book profit, £4m a year of cost saved

Market values are specialist-database figures, not offers. Players already sold in the scenario above and loan-in players are excluded.

Three seasons, with outcomes
Season one is the published headline. Seasons two and three follow the financial model's forecast trajectory, then your moves are carried through their contract years and the outcome presets applied from 2027/28. Same rules engine for every cell.
SeasonFootball incomeSquad costRatioRoom to RedLinesStatus
2026/27
£261m
£245m to £276m
£231m
+£10m vs base
88.7%
+3.6 pts
+£68m
-£10m to Green
85% / 115%Levy zone
2027/28
£261m
£245m to £276m
£231m
+£10m vs base
88.8%
+3.7 pts
+£58m
-£10m to Green
85% / 111%Levy zone
2028/29
£261m
£245m to £276m
£231m
+£10m vs base
88.8%
+3.7 pts
+£48m
-£10m to Green
85% / 107%Levy zone

Promotion is not a preset: every club here is in the Premier League, and newly promoted clubs already carry the promoted-club income floor. Base-case notes: The financial model carries 2027/28 flat against 2026/27: no filed evidence yet of growth or run-off beyond the current squad.

Transfer capacity
A rough translation of annual room into fee capacity before wages.
Current capacity
£0m
Capacity after scenario
£0m

This assumes transfer fees are spread over five-year contracts before wages, agent fees, bonuses and registration timing. It is a translation of room, not a recommended budget.

Breakdown
How each move changes squad cost, revenue and room.

Revenue impact of a sale is one third of the book profit: the League counts player-sale profit through a three-year average, so the same third also lands in each of the next two seasons (see the three-season view).

MoveAnnual transfer-fee costAnnual wagesAgent/signing costsAnnual squad-cost changeBook profit/lossRevenue impactRoom effectAfter this move
Emile Smith Rowe+£5m+£4m£0m+£10m£0m£0m£10m less room88.7% · Levy zone
£69m to Red · -£10m to Green

“After this move” is the cumulative path: the club's position once each move in the scenario has landed, in order.

Amortisation spreads a fee across the contract. A £50m signing on a five-year deal is a £10m annual cost before wages and other fees.

Room effect combines squad-cost change and football-income impact. A sale can help twice: lower costs and, if profitable, stronger football income.

Book profit or loss is sale proceeds minus remaining book value and sale costs. Academy sales often have low book value.

Owner equity is shown only for old PSR because the new squad-cost test is linked to football income, not shareholder funding.

Quick answer

A transfer fee is spread over the contract: a £50m fee on a five-year deal adds about £10m a year. Wages count in full each season. Annual squad cost ≈ fee ÷ contract years + wages + a small allowance for agent and bonus costs. The calculator compares that yearly cost with Fulham's estimated football income - the 85% Green Threshold opens the levy / allowance zone; the 115% Red Threshold is the primary line, where sporting sanctions (points) begin.

Fulham figures here are independent PSRwatch estimates, not official Premier League calculations. Read how PSRwatch builds its estimates, or the plain-English explainers on how transfer fees are spread over contracts and the Premier League squad-cost rule.

Can Fulham afford it? Possible but tighter | PSRwatch