Compare clubs
Different seasons use different financial rules. PSRwatch separates current Squad Cost Ratio views from historical Old PSR/P&S views - this page shows one rule model at a time, never both in one table.
Basis for 2025/26: 3 on PSRwatch estimates of 3 clubs. No club in this table has filed accounts covering this season, so every figure shown is a PSRwatch estimate, not a filed figure.
Model updated: 23 Aug 2026
| Club | Modelled position | Allowance basis | Baseline result | Source-backed result | Max-funded scenario | 3-year result | Revenue | Wages | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipswich Town | £53m room | Baseline allowance | +£53m | no eligible equity found | +£99m (scenario) | +£38m | £90m | £83m | Clear on the modelled numbers Profitable three-year window |
| Aston Villa | £42m room | Source-backed funded allowance | −£48m | +£42m | +£42m (scenario) | −£63m | £454m | £295m | Clear on the modelled numbers Three-year losses in the window |
| Sunderland | £28m room | Baseline allowance | +£28m | no eligible equity found | +£74m (scenario) | +£13m | £47m | £57m | Clear on the modelled numbers Profitable three-year window |
PSRwatch model from filed accounts and public data, before undisclosed/private adjustments - not an official league finding. Old PSR allows higher losses only where secure funding/equity is evidenced - baseline £15m over three years, rising toward £105m only with verified owner equity (owner loans excluded). Share this comparison: psrwatch.com/compare?clubs=eng-ipswich,eng-aston-villa,eng-sunderland&season=2025-26