Compare clubs
Different seasons use different financial rules. PSRwatch separates current Squad Cost Ratio views from historical Old PSR/P&S views - this page shows one rule model at a time, never both in one table.
Basis for 2024/25: 3 on filed accounts of 3 clubs. Figures rest on filed accounts only where a club has published them for this season; the rest are PSRwatch estimates.
Model updated: 23 Aug 2026
| Club | Modelled position | Allowance basis | Baseline result | Source-backed result | Max-funded scenario | 3-year result | Revenue | Wages | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipswich Town | £1m room | Baseline allowance | +£1m | no eligible equity found | +£47m (scenario) | −£14m | £155m | £77m | Tight modelled position Three-year losses in the window |
| Aston Villa | £140m over | Source-backed funded allowance | −£230m | −£140m | −£140m (scenario) | −£245m | £378m | £273m | Modelled £140m over on the funded allowance Three-year losses in the window |
| Sunderland | £3m room | Baseline allowance | +£3m | no eligible equity found | +£27m (scenario) | −£12m | £39m | £53m | Tight modelled position Three-year losses in the window |
PSRwatch model from filed accounts and public data, before undisclosed/private adjustments - not an official league finding. Old PSR allows higher losses only where secure funding/equity is evidenced - baseline £15m over three years, rising toward £105m only with verified owner equity (owner loans excluded). Share this comparison: psrwatch.com/compare?clubs=eng-ipswich,eng-aston-villa,eng-sunderland&season=2024-25