Compare clubs
Different seasons use different financial rules. PSRwatch separates current Squad Cost Ratio views from historical Old PSR/P&S views - this page shows one rule model at a time, never both in one table.
Basis for 2025/26: 3 on PSRwatch estimates of 3 clubs. No club in this table has filed accounts covering this season, so every figure shown is a PSRwatch estimate, not a filed figure.
Model updated: 23 Aug 2026
| Club | Modelled position | Allowance basis | Baseline result | Source-backed result | Max-funded scenario | 3-year result | Revenue | Wages | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coventry City | £6m room | Baseline allowance | +£6m | no eligible equity found | +£30m (scenario) | −£9m | £35m | £29m | Tight modelled position Three-year losses in the window |
| Hull City | £28m over | Baseline allowance | −£28m | no eligible equity found | −£4m (scenario) | −£43m | £26m | £40m | Modelled £28m over on the baseline allowance Three-year losses in the window |
| Ipswich Town | £53m room | Baseline allowance | +£53m | no eligible equity found | +£99m (scenario) | +£38m | £90m | £83m | Clear on the modelled numbers Profitable three-year window |
PSRwatch model from filed accounts and public data, before undisclosed/private adjustments - not an official league finding. Old PSR allows higher losses only where secure funding/equity is evidenced - baseline £15m over three years, rising toward £105m only with verified owner equity (owner loans excluded). Share this comparison: psrwatch.com/compare?clubs=eng-coventry,eng-hull,eng-ipswich&season=2025-26