Compare clubs
Different seasons use different financial rules. PSRwatch separates current Squad Cost Ratio views from historical Old PSR/P&S views - this page shows one rule model at a time, never both in one table.
Basis for 2024/25: 3 on filed accounts of 3 clubs. Figures rest on filed accounts only where a club has published them for this season; the rest are PSRwatch estimates.
Model updated: 23 Aug 2026
| Club | Modelled position | Allowance basis | Baseline result | Source-backed result | Max-funded scenario | 3-year result | Revenue | Wages | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coventry City | £5m room | Baseline allowance | +£5m | no eligible equity found | +£29m (scenario) | −£10m | £34m | £26m | Tight modelled position Three-year losses in the window |
| Hull City | £12m over | Baseline allowance | −£12m | no eligible equity found | +£12m (scenario) | −£27m | £26m | £37m | Modelled £12m over on the baseline allowance Three-year losses in the window |
| Ipswich Town | £1m room | Baseline allowance | +£1m | no eligible equity found | +£47m (scenario) | −£14m | £155m | £77m | Tight modelled position Three-year losses in the window |
PSRwatch model from filed accounts and public data, before undisclosed/private adjustments - not an official league finding. Old PSR allows higher losses only where secure funding/equity is evidenced - baseline £15m over three years, rising toward £105m only with verified owner equity (owner loans excluded). Share this comparison: psrwatch.com/compare?clubs=eng-coventry,eng-hull,eng-ipswich&season=2024-25